Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

His query took 65 milliseconds, not 65 seconds, which is totally reasonable.


Thanks for pointing that out. I totally misread the bottom line. Once I had it in my head that those were seconds, no amount of looking at that little "ms" behind the numbers was going to show me anything different.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: