> "California Corporate Cover-Up Act" is their term for it, not on the actual bill.
As they say in the second sentence of the very first paragraph:
>> S.B. 690, what we’re calling the Corporate Cover-Up Act, is
The linked statute makes far broader exclusions that you imply or would be necessary for what you mention. It just adds "A commercial business purpose" with no provisos or clarification, which invites insanely broad interpretations and effectively nullifies the existing law, just as EFF is saying.
As they say in the second sentence of the very first paragraph:
>> S.B. 690, what we’re calling the Corporate Cover-Up Act, is
The linked statute makes far broader exclusions that you imply or would be necessary for what you mention. It just adds "A commercial business purpose" with no provisos or clarification, which invites insanely broad interpretations and effectively nullifies the existing law, just as EFF is saying.