Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There's always that guy on X who posts about having n remote jobs at the same, waiting to be fired from each so that he can replace its slot with another.

Then next year it's a different guy, same schtick.



I’ve also seen some claim that they will do that and simply sub-contract the work out to cheaper labor

If the employer is satisfied with the employees output, who is being harmed?


A company that is indemnifying their customers for security lapses perhaps?

Or a company that is handling HIPAA, GDPR or other sensitive data and is certifying that they are following policies around employee training, data sovereignty and document handling?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: