Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Depends mostly upon what you're doing.

Having done go and python in jetbrains and vscode, I definitely enjoy the experience in jetbrains more. A lot of java people like IntelliJ for their Java and Kotlin support.

OTOH, copilot has been not as good on Jetbrains as it has been on vscode. Updates are delayed to give VSCode a first mover advantage to VSCode.

Google Gemini Code assist plugin last week still sucked, didn't try it today.

Copilot can also use Gemini Pro 2.5, but they delayed the release of the plugin for Jetbrains, and only have a context of 10 files I believe for the edit mode.

And I thought I read somewhere that Jetbrains AI Assistant can use gemini AI pro, it's limited to a context window of 200,000. I might be wrong on that.

Junie is reasonably good, but still has issues with understanding large code blocks of more than a couple of kilobytes. But it applies the changes first, without letting you do a review of the code. The only real way to do it, is to check in the code in git, then let it run, and then look at the results.

I've asked Junie to fix unit tests using brave mode, and it seems more than capable with that.

I think the trick with Junie is small defined tasks, rather than large bullet points. Or at least have a detailed plan which you can paste in, and reasonably detailed so it won't have to guess or infer what it is you want.

But generally speaking, I've had far better luck with Google Gemini Pro 2.5 on code generation than with some of the others lately.

Edited to add: Github Copilot added agent mode. I'm going to try it now.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: