These are *not* open source licenses; they violate the open source definition. | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		aleph_minus_one 9 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Getting forked by Microsoft These are not open source licenses; they violate the open source definition.

HexDecOctBin 9 months ago [–]

So? I never said they were for Open Source (as defined by some libertarian crusty hacker), and the parent comment never asked for it. Why do people like you always jump in, screaming "It's not Open Source!"?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact