I read most of this article. basically because James Randi dismissed positive results for ESP experiments out of hand that makes him not a skeptic. Because astral projection was rejected out of hand, James Randi isn't a skeptic.
You see, there's data that showed positive test results. And that implies that there is ESP or astral projection or out-of-body communication or channels for communication between members of a tribe or whatever.
And that means that we must consider that data.
The article even quotes the extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, but they apply it to Randi not looking at the data from some ESP experiment.
This article reads like sour grapes and is typical of the anti-skeptic movement.
You see, there's data that showed positive test results. And that implies that there is ESP or astral projection or out-of-body communication or channels for communication between members of a tribe or whatever.
And that means that we must consider that data.
The article even quotes the extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, but they apply it to Randi not looking at the data from some ESP experiment.
This article reads like sour grapes and is typical of the anti-skeptic movement.
Or as James Randi would call it, Woo.