The advantages of Pulsar are very much practical, at least for us. Without it we... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		gnfargbl 10 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Kafka at the low end: how bad can it get? The advantages of Pulsar are very much practical, at least for us. Without it we would have to manage two separate messaging systems. I don't see any evidence of StreamNative abandoning Pulsar at this point. I do see a compatibility layer for the Kafka protocol. That's fine.

akshayshah 10 months ago [–]

It sure looks like they’re going quite a ways beyond Kafka-on-Pulsar - the Ursa/Oxia work they’re focused on right now replaces BookKeeper and seems very firmly Kafka-oriented. Or does Ursa also work with the Pulsar protocol?

matteomerli 10 months ago | [–]

Ursa supports Pulsar protocol as well

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact