Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I specifically mean code not covered by automated tests. And this almost always falls in the dislike/misunderstand pile for me, but not conversely.


I'd argue that even with automated tests it can be considered legacy. Easier to change things if the test coverage is comprehensive enough, but I've yet to find a project like that, even the ones I built myself.


I hope you find one one day. It makes such a difference to have a test suite which you trust, and which doesn't erupt in false failures at the drop of a hat. I completely agree, not all tests are created equal.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: