>The lack of effective performance management in the federal workforce.
>Resulting in poor service provision and wasteful allocation of taxpayer funds.
Alleged. Not proven, alleged.
>No large private sector workforce would have gotten away with such broken processes.
What broken processes? You havent shown them to exist.
Large companies are built to maximixe profit. Governments are not, so why should their organizational choices be similar?
You have clearly never worked in any sizeable workforce, and I can assure you your basic presumption that large private sector workforces does not have broken processes is childishly naive. The "problem" is you, making assumptions of waste where there is none to speak off, unless you can provide some actual data to back that up. The average federal employee earns about $60k/y, they are not there for the money. Firing all federal employees will same about 7h of borrowing.
I'm sorry but the narrative you have invested in so deeply is not founded in reality, not that I expect anyone explaining facts to you will make any appreciable difference.
Enjoy the pain you elected to bring upon yourself, you deserve the government you got.
You can’t generalize about the entire public sector from a couple anecdotes. Of course there are going to be badly run groups inside an organization of that size. I can tell you there exists management inside the federal government that runs performance management and fires underperformers.
Since you fall victim to such an obvious fallacy, it makes sense that you would wind up hired into low-performing groups.
What problem?
The problem of how people are fired? You dont fix that specific problem by firing everyone!
Somw other problem? Show us evidence that there was a problem, before you fire. That's how you do it in a democracy.