It would be carbon capture... but it feels like such a needlessly destructive me... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		aDyslecticCrow 11 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Carbon capture more costly than switching to renew... It would be carbon capture... but it feels like such a needlessly destructive method. It's up there with atmosphere manipulation in "bad ideas that we should only even consider if we're desperatre"

pfdietz 11 months ago [–]

It's destructive, but it exploits the extremely low cost per unit energy of nuclear explosives (particularly large ones).

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact