> We apparently don’t even have a name for it. We just call it “CI” because that...

		keybored 10 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: I'll think twice before using GitHub Actions again > We apparently don’t even have a name for it. We just call it “CI” because that’s the adjacent practice. “Oh no the CI failed” Martin Fowler apparently calls this “continuous build” (the build itself without CI necessarily). And that’s better.