>committee of glacially moving bureaucracy to decide for science to move forward by wholesale replacing one theory with another.
Are you saying that this exists today?
I feel like you want there to be some nefarious behind the scenes Snidely Whiplash sort of character keeping science held back, and that's just not the case.
We use the current theories and not phlogiston or whatever your straw man theory is because they're the best ones we have right now. They will change with new information.
It legitimately seems like you don't understand the basics of the scientific process.
All of human history is full of Snidely Whiplash characters refusing to let go of the first-mover theories they grew into, no matter the evidence of the contrary. My observation is simply that today is a part of history and thus is still padded with these caricatures and their sycophant yes-men.
“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”
-Max Planck, physicist of some renown, prescient of this and many other comment threads
That's the point I was trying to get across. It's not that they're perfect or even right. They're just the best we have. Like aether and 4 elements and miasma. It wasn't great but it's what we had.
Are you saying that this exists today?
I feel like you want there to be some nefarious behind the scenes Snidely Whiplash sort of character keeping science held back, and that's just not the case.
We use the current theories and not phlogiston or whatever your straw man theory is because they're the best ones we have right now. They will change with new information.
It legitimately seems like you don't understand the basics of the scientific process.