Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Gmail was revolutionary at the start, but stopped innovating 10 years ago - why don’t we still have a good search engine within it?

MapReduce would be invented anyway (I implemented it from scratch before learning of it’s existence).

Chrome is just a slightly upgraded Firefox (and novadays Safari is just as good if not better with ai)

PageRank was what gave Google monopoly, it’s not a result of monopoly.

Go - I can give you that. ProtoBuf - not my field, but isn’t it just a format that someone else would develop to fill a niche? (unlike say mp3 that had new compression algorithms baked in)

Maps - I can give you that. Some people might argue that it was an acquisition, but without Google’s muscle, Street View would not be feasible.



> Chrome is just a slightly upgraded Firefox

Wat. It's like saying that an apple is a slightly upgraded orange. I would understand if you mentioned KHTML and Safari as relatives, but "slightly upgraded" does not fit anyway.

> PageRank was what gave Google monopoly

I don't think so. PageRank has been successfully implemented elsewhere, and outmatched. What helped Google build a monopoly was the first mover advantage, the network effects, and the incessant streams of money from AdWords (invented by Google), DoubleClick (acquired) and a bunch of other advertisement tools.

> Maps - I can give you that.

Don't :) Google Maps is an acquisition from 20 years ago. (As is Android, AdSense, and many other core flagship products of the Google brand.)

If you want a relatively recent, successful Google service for general public, it's Google Photos.


>Google Maps is an acquisition from 20 years ago. (As is Android)

This is comical. When Google acquired Android, it was nothing more than a 3000 line JavaScript demo. The Android OS was created entirely at Google.


It's the same for Google Maps. It was just a C++ demo when acquired, nothing at all like what we see today.


>If you want a relatively recent, successful Google service for general public, it's Google Photos.

I seem to recall that followed the acquisition of Picasa.


Picasa was rather different: it had a desktop client, had tags, did not have a dedicated view mode, etc. It ran as a separate product, and then was shut down, not integrated.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picasa


> Gmail was revolutionary at the start, but stopped innovating 10 years ago - why don't we still have a good search engine within it?

Not sure about your experience, but I used to subscribe to a lot of mailing lists just so that I can search for mailing list content using gmail, because the search function implemented by those mailing lists were generally worse.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: