Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There was an implication in there on risk. If you don't believe a company doing $4 bill of revenue is significantly less risky than the average VC investment, you might be in dreamworld.


My understanding is that it is 4B of losses, not revenue.


Both are approximately true. But, anything software has some accounting for things (like training a model) that really should be categorized as capex instead of opex and it distorts the numbers.


My understanding was that total revenue was an order of magnitude lower, in the multi-millions.


No, it's reported to be at a run rate of $4 bill pa.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: