Dual-layer LCD is best thought of as a separate technology from tandem OLED, due to being transmissive rather than emissive. In many respects, it surpasses OLED, which is why mastering monitors used in Hollywood still employ this technology. Unfortunately, the poor efficiency and excessive energy consumption/heat output have hindered its adoption in the consumer market.
> In many respects, it surpasses OLED, which is why mastering monitors used in Hollywood still employ this technology.
Flanders Scientific were the main champions of dual LCDs in that market, and even they have phased out all of their dual LCD models in favor of QD-OLED ones now. I think they just brute force through OLEDs usual brightness limits by actively cooling the panel.
Also, it costs $25,000. But that might not be related to it being a dual-layer LCD, but rather other exacting tolerances for professional mastering use.
Those rules and regulations only apply to consumer products, business/professional products are exempt. This product is obviously not a consumer product.
Dual LCDs also have poor brightness since a lot less light gets through the two layers. That can be overcome by a much stronger backlight, which produces tons of heat that require active cooling.
And speaking of high-brightness LED panels, I can swear I got a tan from one during a conference where the panel was sitting with the back towards the panel.
