Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I miss that information, have you a link to share ?


A 5 minute overview, https://chrismcdonough.substack.com/p/the-nixos-conflict-in-...

Another overview (easy to understand, but some non-central information is inaccurate), https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5819317/nixos-commits-a-purg...

Concrete events & evidences, https://github.com/nrdxp/rfc-evidence/blob/master/rfc_eviden...




Note that that is from very early on in the process. The last I heard (about a month ago?) the final result was several (many of? more than 3, less than all?) people who signed the letter mentioned in the Reg article left for various reasons, several right at the point when a certain person had their commit-status re-enabled after a ban. I believe said person was eventually banned at a later point.

There are at least 2 forks that happened seemingly as a result of these disputes (Aux, as mentioned in the Reg article and Lix)


> This is a repository that aims to concisely explain the issues in Nix community

https://github.com/KFearsoff/nix-drama-explained




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: