The "kub" very much implied that this installs/includes/is based around k8s. It isn't, and that's a poor choice in name due to needless friction.
This is similar to an Ubuntu "spin" so I'm ot sure why someone would go through all the effort but of customization with out releasing a proper remix that just gives you the out of box XP with lower friction.
This clearly isn't meant for containers, maybe folks who dev on windows and use a VM will find it more useful given WSL2
Only none of those have any sort of contextual meaning in tech, let alone the specific context of self hosting and web development.
You don't prove a point by being silly about random tokens out of context.
"kub" in the context of tech, specifically tooling for a developer of web tech, it's better to avoid using names that have similarities to tools they don't touch.
It's good marketing because it's good UX.
You can continue your pedantry if you like, the context of our tooling is what it is, and no sort of absurd reductionist argument is going to change that.
Loved how you went above and beyond in your reply.. I know it's not 100% on-form for HN but it was a great rebuttal to what I also felt was an uncalled-for criticism of the name.
This is similar to an Ubuntu "spin" so I'm ot sure why someone would go through all the effort but of customization with out releasing a proper remix that just gives you the out of box XP with lower friction.
This clearly isn't meant for containers, maybe folks who dev on windows and use a VM will find it more useful given WSL2