Heh, perhaps you could use the text comments to constantly update a visual description generated by AI? That way, nobody needs to make a drawing. Conversely, nobody has direct control over the visuals.
I envision a UI where people type their comment into a text box, that comment is sent to the server which is constantly updating the "visuals that describe the idea". Each client updates their UI with the new visuals along with providing some way of attaching all the comments to the visual images/videos/diagrams. IOW, the AI-generated visuals are the center of the client UI, rather than just a scrolling tape of comments. Clients can then navigate the discussion by diving into different components of the discussion. Maybe there's even an AI-generated summary of some sort. Essentially, the AI is playing the role of a Designer drawing pictures in a side channel and a smart assistant who is constantly updating a summary abstract.
I like your ideas here, and for some reason your comments remind me of the vision of Google Wave, which was much hyped but suffered in my opinion from its lack of usage. It also had a weird interaction model which wasn’t quite public or private, sort of like the issues Google+ had with Circles. I’m reminded of the poor UI/UX and design/ergonomics of playing Nintendo games online with Friend Codes.
I remember the hype around Google Wave, but I never personally had the opportunity to try it out. I recall seeing some screenshots that looked a bit like Google groups but with more icons. I did use Google Circles and Google+. Sounds like a fun bit of weekend research.
I think parts of Wave were incorporated into Google+, now discontinued (running theme with Google products unfortunately), as well as incorporated in some collaboration/feedback/commenting features of Google Docs, iirc.
Please reply back if you find anything interesting about Wave, it was pretty interesting at the time.
I envision a UI where people type their comment into a text box, that comment is sent to the server which is constantly updating the "visuals that describe the idea". Each client updates their UI with the new visuals along with providing some way of attaching all the comments to the visual images/videos/diagrams. IOW, the AI-generated visuals are the center of the client UI, rather than just a scrolling tape of comments. Clients can then navigate the discussion by diving into different components of the discussion. Maybe there's even an AI-generated summary of some sort. Essentially, the AI is playing the role of a Designer drawing pictures in a side channel and a smart assistant who is constantly updating a summary abstract.