> The problem is that there is an obvious interpretation (count the nuts) and a less obvious interpretation (count the spaces between the nuts)
Only if one goes with your "obvious" interpretation the artwork should obviously not be called anything to do with Pythagoras, since his theorem is about side lenghts, i.e. lines (spaces). Not points (nuts).
Only if one goes with your "obvious" interpretation the artwork should obviously not be called anything to do with Pythagoras, since his theorem is about side lenghts, i.e. lines (spaces). Not points (nuts).