The alternative was the economy minister largely responsible of how we got to where we are now. Minister of a president who basically said "you know what I'm out" in 2022 and basically gave the government to said minister.
> The alternative was the economy minister largely responsible of how we got to where we are now.
That's the problem though. It's completely understandable to vote against that. But to have one option to the status quo, and that option is this?
It's basically like you have lived beyond your means for a long while and you live in a too big house and the sensible solution might be to get another job, sell the car and move to a smaller place. But see that choice doesn't exist. Your choice is to keep aggregating debt, OR you burn the house down and live in a tent.
The problem with very bitter medicine like this is that it risks swinging back the other way just as fast when people become angry enough.
