> This has nothing to do with interpreted or compiled.
I agree with you. That's what I tried to express in my post. They asked for a compiled lisp but the actual requirement was self contained executables which interpreted languages could also fulfill.
Yes. Many Lisp implementations even can mix it in one executable. One, two or three modes of these: source interpreter, byte code interpreter, native code.
I agree with you. That's what I tried to express in my post. They asked for a compiled lisp but the actual requirement was self contained executables which interpreted languages could also fulfill.