Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

i care little for whatever is going on here but you seem to be purposely ignoring the last part of the sentence.

extra welfare + women voting, (both difficult for libertarians blah blah), have rendered the notion of “capitalist democracy” into an oxymoron.

edit:

downvote all you like, it doesn't magically make a quarter of a sentence not exist.



He means that welfare beneficiaries and women vote in way that is against his image of what a capitalist democracy should be.


That's an interpretation, sure, i'm not even arguing against it, i truly do not care either way.

All i was pointing out is that leaving out a section of a sentence you are trying to explain your interpretation of is not a good way to convey that you are arguing in good faith.

Especially when that section could be thought of as not neatly fitting in to the narrative you are trying to explain.


You really need to train your reading comprehension


Always up for some training.

What part of my reply stood out to you as the part that shows i didn't understand what i was reading ?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: