Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Russia is not a superpower or even remotely close to such a status. No country besides the US is currently considered a superpower.


The point is more that Russia has nuclear weapons, so the end result (if things go badly wrong) could be extremely tragic.


Any country with the ability to completely erase entire countries (i.e. has an enormous stockpile of nuclear weapons) is a superpower.


There are many other powers that a nation might have other than nuclear ability, and having nukes does not actually grant any of those other powers. North Korea, for example, may have nuclear weapons, but they have little diplomatic power, little economic power, little ability to project power, etc. The word "superpower" is typically used to describe a country that dominates many different types of these powers.


As far as we know North Korea doesn’t have the capability to hit any target in the world (like US, UK, France and Russia) or enough nukes to blow up half of the world. So hardly comparable


That might be a necessary condition, but definitely not a sufficient one to be considered a superpower. Simple thought experiment, "completely erasing" the US as you suggest would render the Earth unpleasant to live on, for a while, for all inhabitants.


yes, that's why they remain a superpower. If you have the ability to make life on earth extremely unpleasant for all of humanity, that's super power status. Even just having nuclear weapons isn't enough for that- you need large numbers of fusion bombs -- which Russia has, and the US has, and no one else does.


No, this is just not correct. Being a superpower requires, at a minimum, being able to win a conventional war with a state lacking nuclear weapons. The reason for that is that nuclear weapons cannot actually be used in practice. They can only serve as a deterrent to not be attacked.


I'm sorry, what? Do Russians not live on Earth or something?


They seems to have some highly suicidal tendencies and really don’t mind massive casualties these days (e.g. 5x more Russian died in Ukraine in just 2 years than during the entire 10 year long Soviet war in Afghanistan).

So one has to double whether they live in the same reality as most people in the west which makes them pretty scary and unpredictable


Bear in mind that the population of Russia is ~140-150M people:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia

Whereas Ukraine's is ~35M people:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine

So the approach of just overwhelming Ukraine with relentless numbers could be effective, even if callous/unsophisticated.

Kind of like that old saying "if it's dumb, but works... it's not dumb". As unfortunate as that is.


> the approach of just overwhelming Ukraine with relentless numbers could be effective

Is unclear at this moment. It only matters how much of this 34M/150M people are in an accurate age/sex to fight. Putin wouldn't survive a move to force massively women to enlist in the army, and Russia had yet a demographics problem. One million of youngsters exiled and are unavailable to became hamburgers.

Also Russia is trying to kill anybody in that 35M of people but Ukraine mostly fight only the Russian soldiers. I bet that each Ukrainian soldier had killed yet more than five Russian soldiers at the current meatwave ratio.


North Korea and Pakistan are superpowers?


would be a weekend superpower, for a very short amount of time




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: