wasn't compelling until his example of two gmails at once (currently a pain) I think this applies to many most hackers who might have two seperate social or business commitments at once

You can forward your mail from multiple gmail acccounts to a single account and use the "Send mail as" (under Settings/Accounts). Gmail is smart enough to usually pick the right "send as" address.

Except for mailing lists.

In my experience it seems that if To:/CC:/BCC: doesn't contain one of your addresses gmail sticks with your default rather than using the address of the mailbox it fetched the email from in the first place.

also when it sends under an "alias" mine always says From x using y (where y = my original account) ;(

I’m coming to the end of a 30 day free trial of Mailplane which I use for the reason you describe, and I definitely intend to purchase it.

http://mailplaneapp.com/

Alternatively you could run multiple Fluid apps (or whatever the equivalent is for your preferred OS).

http://fluidapp.com/

Have you considered the wonders of forwarded email?

I have tons of my_name@random_domain emails, some serious, some not. They all forward to my gmail (and also to another IMAP server because storage is cheap) And gmail even lets you send email from different addresses! Yay!

I hope your contacts are aware of the forwarding. Not everyone likes to send mail to a gmail account:

http://epic.org/privacy/gmail/faq.html

I don't understand this objection. I could forward their email to a random gmail user. I could actually be using Google apps for my domain (which I do). There are many many ways for an email to end up in gmail that don't require you to send your email to a something@gmail.com account.

(That and I find the gmail privacy thing confusing. Isn't this a problem for all the other webmail hosts? Most of the things I'm seeing are "they aren't doing it now, but they could", well, so could Yahoo, or any of the people in between. Email is not the world's most secure message medium...)

I can't agree with your first paragraph. It's a small breach of trust if I send mail to an innocent domain and it ends up on the servers of an advertising company where it is scanned for keywords without my consent. Remember that you agreed to Google's terms of service, but the persons that send mail to you did not.

I'm grossly exaggerating now, but if we replace gmail with IRS, I'm sure that most people would regard the forwarding as a big breach of trust.

You say that a lot of people could read the mail while it is in transit. This is of course true, but a student running ettercap or a sysadmin grepping the mail queue would face criminal charges. By scanning inbound mail from third parties, Google is operating in a legally dark grey area.

I'm not aware of other webmail providers doing the same thing.

Regarding Google apps:

If I find out that a company uses Google apps, I would probably take my business elsewhere for the same privacy reasons.

Interesting that Google feels the need to use non-google.com domain names for handling the mail of apps customers:

dig -t mx salesforce.com

salesforce.com. 300 IN MX 100 salesforce.com.s8a1.psmtp.com.

whois psmtp.com

Google, Inc.

Perhaps I am old-fashioned, but an honest name would be e.g:

mx12345.apps.google.com.

Okay, I understand your objection, and I think we're going to just have to disagree on that one.

I'm actually curious about that psmtp.com thing, I remember setting my mx records to point to something that shouted "yes, I use Google", maybe they have some separate arrangement? (I dug a bit, and my MX is: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM)

AHA! I looked into it a bit, psmtp is actually Postini, which Google bought. I assume they use psmtp for corporate accounts that need better um. something.

So blame postini perhaps ;)

Yes, you're right. Perhaps Postini does not scan, in which case it would be ok to keep psmtp.com.

> wasn't compelling until his example of two gmails at once (currently a pain)

Run firefox with an alternate profile (firefox -P other_profile --no-remote).

That'll start a separate firefox instance which has it's own cookies, etc.

That's what I use to have personal & public gmail accounts.

I use Safari and Firefox for 2 gmail accounts. That pain point doesn't seem compelling enough. Many/most hackers have two browsers installed

many/most hackers don't have a problem with multiple tabs.... or they just use Evolution/Mail/Outlook instead :)

Using multiple tabs alone won't hack it for monitoring two Google accounts at once -- the tabs share the same login cookie.

I'm doing it now... Google App cookies and GMail cookies are different.

Granted when I attempt to log in to a Google application other than GMail the cookies do collide.... but that's the point of multiple web browsers :)

And to boot, Google Apps dont share cookies. I have 3 accounts, one @gmail and two under apps. I can have both the apps accounts open with no collision. Makes sense, but it's nice.