Because eventually you’ll run out of people that can be hired.
Unless you’re making an argument that there are more software developers than job openings in the US, which is patently false.
And more importantly, this case is more about people who were already employed at Apple, on a non-immigrant visa, that Apple wished to retain permanently. I see no actual wrongdoing here. A tried and tested employee is ALWAYS better than an unknown one.
>Because eventually you’ll run out of people that can be hired.
I am not sure I am following again. Have you worked anywhere at all or know anybody who worked somewhere? Ask them, the positions get filled, nobody runs out of people, and Apple is doubly so.
>Unless you’re making an argument that there are more software developers than job openings in the US, which is patently false.
No, I am making argument that there are able, qualified and willing US software developers, or any other professionals, available to take any job at Apple.
Because eventually you’ll run out of people that can be hired.
Unless you’re making an argument that there are more software developers than job openings in the US, which is patently false.
And more importantly, this case is more about people who were already employed at Apple, on a non-immigrant visa, that Apple wished to retain permanently. I see no actual wrongdoing here. A tried and tested employee is ALWAYS better than an unknown one.