Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>Some of it may even in retrospect be true or partially true

Insanity lol.

A person that thinks like this is exactly the type of political danger it is prudent to fear and oppose.

Again, "disinformation" is nearly meaningless. That you oppose or disagree with one's opinions or political views is not grounds for that person to be OK with you censoring them. In fact they should view you as a political enemy. It is the fundamental rationale for the 1st amendment.

The China lab-leak is likely true. Masks don't work. What a weird position to hold whereby completely rational views are legitimate grounds for complete subversion of the 1st amendment. This is Dunning–Kruger-like in it's complete inversion of who should be deemed crazy, stupid, or politically dangerous.



>Masks Don't Work

Right, disinformation then.

>High-quality studies have shown that use of face masks in the community is associated with reduced transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and is likely to be an important component of an effective response to a future respiratory threat.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle...

Again, feel free to make claims with evidence. I'll even congratulate you for getting it.

>The China lab-leak is likely true.

Maybe, maybe not, we may never know. Funny how you threw in "likely", when every MAGA hat wearing idiot was shouting it with certainty two years ago with spittle flying out of their mouth at me and every other healthcare worker.

Dunning-Kruger don't mean what you think it means either.


> > The China lab-leak is likely true.

> Maybe, maybe not, we may never know

Do you consider those that discredited or supressed the lab leak theory to be spreaders of "disinformation" and worthy of censorship as well?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: