>As a "my government made our money useless" back up.
I think that's where you first get into "some other governments money may be less useless" as a first stage backup. Precious metals in direct ownership are really a hedge against all or most other governments money collapsing.
Until you reach a global societal collapse, having gold in your possession seems like a negative ROI and I wonder if, should that case happen, would precious metals again become the medium of exchange or something else (peoples' opinions have changed and a fist full of diamonds might not be as valuable to me as say fresh drinking water should such a thing happen). It would likely depend on the cause of global collapse and what people consider valuable (obviously, but it probably needs stated).
Precious metals seem to be a good medium of exchange historically only at a certain level of assumed societal infrastructure, similar to our fiat currencies. Cavemen and small tribes cared little of precious metals and would rather trade land, access rights, livestock, etc.
In collapsed societies gold isn't great either. You would want to have things that people actually need. Some gold might buy you some antibiotics but the valuable thing isn't the gold and the antibiotics seller would know that.
To add on to this, when I think about a situation where you're trying to hedge against all government-backed fiat collapsing; I feel like you're already down to cold-hard bartering. The saying of "booze, bullets, and bandages" comes to mind.
I think that's where you first get into "some other governments money may be less useless" as a first stage backup. Precious metals in direct ownership are really a hedge against all or most other governments money collapsing.
Until you reach a global societal collapse, having gold in your possession seems like a negative ROI and I wonder if, should that case happen, would precious metals again become the medium of exchange or something else (peoples' opinions have changed and a fist full of diamonds might not be as valuable to me as say fresh drinking water should such a thing happen). It would likely depend on the cause of global collapse and what people consider valuable (obviously, but it probably needs stated).
Precious metals seem to be a good medium of exchange historically only at a certain level of assumed societal infrastructure, similar to our fiat currencies. Cavemen and small tribes cared little of precious metals and would rather trade land, access rights, livestock, etc.