> The fix is straightforward: just use a strict pair type for nested accumul... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

wingo on March 25, 2012 | parent | context | favorite | on: Haskell as fast as C: working at a high altitude f...

> The fix is straightforward: just use a strict pair type for nested accumulators:

Uf. Haskell impresses me a lot, but it seems that performance-wise, it would be better if it were strict by default.

Tyr42 on March 25, 2012 | [–]

But the rest of the fusion and other transformations work better when lazy.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact