Substitute IoT for router in everything we wrote there on page 12-13 and that seems to be a starting point everyone around here has come to think is necessary. I would prefer not to summarize such a large filing here.
Also Dan Geer wrote extensively on these topics at the time.
I care most deeply first - that the front doors to our houses, the home gateways, are properly secured, kept up to date, and have ipv6 and bufferbloat fixes on them.
http://www.taht.net/~d/fcc_saner_software_practices.pdf
Substitute IoT for router in everything we wrote there on page 12-13 and that seems to be a starting point everyone around here has come to think is necessary. I would prefer not to summarize such a large filing here.
Also Dan Geer wrote extensively on these topics at the time.
Of late I have been strongly suggesting that software be at least "built in america": https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/an_upgrade_in_place/
I care most deeply first - that the front doors to our houses, the home gateways, are properly secured, kept up to date, and have ipv6 and bufferbloat fixes on them.
IoT devices belong on their own vlan...