Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A low number of false positives with a water pistol is an impressive engineering feat. A low number of false positives with an actual gun is a disaster. The technology is still a long way off.


Accurate sensing, the ability to accurately distinguish between combatants[1] and non-combatants, seems to be an almost impossible task. While there are robots in active service today they all have a human involved somewhere, especially if there's lethal force going to be used.

It's pretty scary to think that humans could be removed from that loop. I can't work out why I'm happy to see totally autonomous cars but I'm wary about autonomous weapons.

(http://rusi.org/downloads/assets/23sharkey.pdf)

(http://andrewgibsondefence.wordpress.com/2010/10/17/should-k...)

[1] And even if you can identify an enemy combatant you've got to then distinguish active combatants from those who have surrendered or are injured or are mentally ill.


It's not a problem for counter-sniping and no man's land.


No man's land control and anti-air defense is exactly what I saw such solutions marketed for, when browsing through drone tech last year.


I disagree. Accidentally shooting a couple of kids or pregnant women every few weeks can easily make you lose a war on the political front.


In a few priviledged parts of the world.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: