They won’t be making anywhere near 1/10th of what Firefox makes, even with 1/10th of the user base, because those are highly specialised contracts.
Google typically won’t touch you at all (although the founders connections may help them here, but I could see that upsetting some of Google’s business partners). Almost every Google search partnership is a legacy one.
With Bing, you’re looking at a standard revenue share, of which they take a cut, and you’re at the whim of seasonality, not a fixed sum as say Firefox has.
Then, the investors won’t just want their investment back; they’ll want a proper return as well.
Like I’ve said, the monetization opportunities that respect the user are hard.
Avast made a killing with their browser, and they did that by selling user data.
The fact that they’re a closed source browser does not lend them any favours.
They won’t be making anywhere near 1/10th of what Firefox makes, even with 1/10th of the user base, because those are highly specialised contracts.
Google typically won’t touch you at all (although the founders connections may help them here, but I could see that upsetting some of Google’s business partners). Almost every Google search partnership is a legacy one.
With Bing, you’re looking at a standard revenue share, of which they take a cut, and you’re at the whim of seasonality, not a fixed sum as say Firefox has. Then, the investors won’t just want their investment back; they’ll want a proper return as well.
Like I’ve said, the monetization opportunities that respect the user are hard.
Avast made a killing with their browser, and they did that by selling user data.
The fact that they’re a closed source browser does not lend them any favours.