There are multiple jurisdictions where there have been rumblings that an AI-generated work is possibly a derived work from every single work that the AI was trained with. This hasn't been properly tested in court, but I would give very high odds that the standard will be upheld at least somewhere where Steam sells things.
If this is true, then ordinary copyright law means that AI-generated media cannot be used unless you have a release from every bit of training data you used. At least some of the currently existing AI:s were trained with datasets for which such releases are impossible, so they should not be used.
Also, for the love of god, do not use any of the AI coding assistants, or if you do, at least never publicly admit you do.
> multiple jurisdictions where there have been rumblings that an AI-generated work is possibly a derived work from every single work that the AI was trained with
This should apply to humans as well then because brains ultimately do the exact same thing. Nobody creates art in a vaccuum.
If this is true, then ordinary copyright law means that AI-generated media cannot be used unless you have a release from every bit of training data you used. At least some of the currently existing AI:s were trained with datasets for which such releases are impossible, so they should not be used.
Also, for the love of god, do not use any of the AI coding assistants, or if you do, at least never publicly admit you do.