The title was better for Forbes, but the article length was more relevant I thin... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		forrestthewoods on Feb 19, 2012 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: How Forbes Stole a New York Times Article and Got ... The title was better for Forbes, but the article length was more relevant I think. Forbes article was two short pages while the NY Times was 7 long pages. I have half a dozen long NY Times articles bookmarked to read later. I don't know if I'll ever get around to it.

mtkd on Feb 19, 2012 [–]

Thinking about it - in last couple of months I've done this with every long article I've come across. My Instapaper has a week of reading.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact