The article is absolutely right that right now and for at least a few decades, we have to live with death. It does not mean however that death is a good thing.

I mean, who would want to die when they live a life worth living? And who would want their life to stop being worth living?

(And no, I don't buy the saying that says live is meaningful only because it eventually stops.)

You committed the naturalistic fallacy. Also, inevitability isn't a justification for bad things happening.

There are also practical considerations: if death is eliminated, we must stop reproduction too.

I would prioritize existing lives over the yet to be born.

From an evolutionary point of view that makes very little sense.

Even in startup culture, it makes sense that some business (existing lives) have to die in order for new business models (those yet to be born) to emerge.

What's to say that the existing lives won't hinder growth that would happen from new lives being born and re-imagining the world that everyone is used to?

Let me know if find it interesting (or not :))

Oh yeah?. I suppose you wouldn't be afraid of jumping off a cliff, then? Most of the time, fear is very, very useful. Don't underestimate it.

Now, fear of death specifically might be wrong. But fear of whatever causes death sure is not.