Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why is surveillance a requirement? Local recordings would have virtually no downsides unless the intention is to evade responsibility for traffic collisions.


I do actually have a dashcam built into my personal vehicle. I have mixed feelings about it, but overall I think the benefits outweigh the risks.

that said, the risks are not to be taken lightly. even if the recording is only stored locally, it can be seized by authorities or subpoenaed later. you can't guarantee it will only be used to settle minor traffic disputes.

like I said, I'm (mostly) happy to make that decision for myself. but having the government require people to collect evidence against themselves is a hard no from me.


>but having the government require people to collect evidence against themselves is a hard no from me.

Not an expert on US constitution, but Isn't that a violation?


Driving on public roads is a privilege, not a right, which is why it's legal for them to institutes requirements like "must have insurance" or "must have a driver's license".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: