Given a list of officials, absolutely, and if there is no list, nobody would just start spouting off names that don't match the rule at all -- and the failure here is due to inability to apply basic stated directions in a logical manner. Most likely this is due to the processing of tokens not being on a character level, but it will also imply that it possesses character-level language knowledge if you ask it to produce a list of infrequent trigrams in the English language:
> As an AI language model, I do not have access to a pre-existing list of the least frequent trigrams in English. However, I can generate a list of some of the rarest trigrams based on the frequency of occurrence in a large corpus of English language text. . . . (list follows)
How can I be sure of this list it claims to generate when I have evidence it can't identify substrings?
Inability to complete certain tasks does not mean that the system is not intelligent.
It’s possible for a system to be intelligent and also fail at these questions.
IMO a system is intelligent if it can answer some questions that require intelligence (by definition) - it does not have to be able to answer all questions.
> As an AI language model, I do not have access to a pre-existing list of the least frequent trigrams in English. However, I can generate a list of some of the rarest trigrams based on the frequency of occurrence in a large corpus of English language text. . . . (list follows)
How can I be sure of this list it claims to generate when I have evidence it can't identify substrings?