Duh. But that's not what you're saying, you're saying "without privatised land, farming cannot occur", which is a trivially false assertion.
>Also, all monetizable "things" represent assets because they hold/produce value.
Yes, that is indeed the definition of asset: an ownable and tradable "thing". I fail to see the point.
The world's land is privatized. What ought to be has no relevance.
Farming is asset-driven for that reason.
I'm not debating what could be; only what is.
Duh. But that's not what you're saying, you're saying "without privatised land, farming cannot occur", which is a trivially false assertion.
>Also, all monetizable "things" represent assets because they hold/produce value.
Yes, that is indeed the definition of asset: an ownable and tradable "thing". I fail to see the point.