Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Me: Please write me a paragraph explaining why content written by ChatGPT is likely to be of lower quality than that written by a human writer.

ChatGPT: As an AI language model, ChatGPT generates text based on statistical patterns it has learned from large amounts of human-written text. While it has the ability to produce coherent and grammatically correct sentences, it lacks the human touch of intuition, creativity, and emotions that make writing engaging and memorable. Additionally, ChatGPT may produce inaccurate or biased information if the data it has been trained on is flawed or incomplete. It also does not have the ability to understand the nuances of human language, such as sarcasm or humor, which can lead to misunderstandings. Overall, while ChatGPT can be a useful tool for generating text quickly and efficiently, it is unlikely to match the quality and depth of content produced by a human writer.

Well, at least it's honest about that. shrug

To be fair though, let's give it a chance to plead it's case the other way:

Me: Please write me a paragraph explaining why content written by ChatGPT is likely to be of higher quality than that written by a human writer.

ChatGPT: As an AI language model, ChatGPT has the ability to generate large amounts of high-quality content quickly and efficiently, without the limitations of fatigue, bias, or emotional interference that can affect human writers. With its vast knowledge base, ChatGPT can access information and synthesize it in ways that would be difficult or time-consuming for a human writer to do. Additionally, ChatGPT's writing is free of typos and grammatical errors, and it can produce text in multiple languages, making it a versatile tool for content creation. ChatGPT's writing is also free of human biases that can affect human writers, making it a useful tool for producing objective and unbiased content. Overall, while ChatGPT may lack the human touch of creativity and intuition, its ability to generate high-quality content quickly and objectively makes it a valuable tool for content creation in many contexts.



At least tell us if this is GTP4 (the paid version) or not. I know GTP can say amazing and relevant things, but at this point quoting it is like copy pasting large sections of Wikipedia without added insight. We can all go talk to GTP ourselves if we want.


No, that was GPT 3.5. But here's the GPT 4 version, if anyone is interested:

Me: Please write me a paragraph explaining why content written by ChatGPT is likely to be of lower quality than that written by a human writer.

GPT 4: While ChatGPT, based on the GPT-4 architecture, is an impressive AI language model that can generate human-like text, it is important to acknowledge its limitations in comparison to a human writer. First, ChatGPT lacks the nuanced understanding of context that humans possess, which can lead to inconsistencies or inaccuracies in its responses. Second, its training data, which is only current up to September 2021, may leave it unable to address recent developments or ideas. Third, the AI model can be sensitive to input phrasing, meaning that slight changes in the user's prompt can yield vastly different results. Finally, it cannot draw on personal experiences, emotions, or empathy in the same way that a human writer can, which may make its content less engaging, relatable, or authentic. While ChatGPT can produce impressive text, it is essential to recognize the areas where it falls short of a skilled human writer.

And the other way around:

Me: Please write me a paragraph explaining why content written by ChatGPT is likely to be of higher quality than that written by a human writer.

GPT 4: Content generated by ChatGPT, utilizing the advanced GPT-4 architecture, has the potential to surpass human writers in certain aspects. Firstly, its vast knowledge base, which encompasses a wide array of subjects, allows it to provide well-informed and accurate content on diverse topics, often exceeding the expertise of a single human writer. Secondly, its ability to process and analyze large amounts of data quickly enables it to deliver high-quality content efficiently, often in a matter of seconds. Additionally, ChatGPT's impartial nature can reduce the risk of personal bias or emotions affecting the content, promoting a more objective and factual output. Furthermore, the AI's consistency in grammar, spelling, and writing style ensures that the generated content maintains a high standard of quality, free from common human errors. While it may not replace the creativity and empathy of human writers, ChatGPT offers distinct advantages in specific contexts.

Doesn't appear to be a huge difference at first blush. YMMV.


TBH, 99% of human writers would struggle to produce this analysis at all, let alone efficiently.

This is why so many people are turning to ChatGPT.


“ without the limitations of…bias”

Human writers also have a hard time recognizing and acknowledging their own bias, so I guess this is pretty spot on.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: