I'd prefer to live in a world where wealth was a little more concentrated and I lived to 150 than a world where it's a little less concentrated and I lived to 75.
If you look at the demographics for most countries, we're not running into an overpopulation problem anywhere in the developed world.
If banning medical care after 50 reduced inequality by reducing lifespans should we do it?
Yeah imagine how great it would for all the wealth and power to be held by people over 100 years older than you. We could have presidents from before WWI telling us about how they bought a house for $100 dollars and disparaging the youth for not doing the same in a market that is, oh by the way, many times more expensive because these old folks just won’t die.
If you look at the demographics for most countries, we're not running into an overpopulation problem anywhere in the developed world.
If banning medical care after 50 reduced inequality by reducing lifespans should we do it?