Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It seems that the statement "blood flow doesn't tell you anything about neural activity" is definitely not true: https://www.nature.com/scitable/blog/brain-metrics/what_does...

Also, it seems dangerous to suggest rejecting studying a specific area because the scientific tools and our understanding around it are currently limited - this is what science is for after all. If we thought this way, we wouldn't have nutrition research.



Nutrition research is famously inconsistent though?


Terribly so. So we need more high-quality research, not to stop researching it. The scientific method can only get better by putting it in practice.


Or we need to recognize some fundamental limits on what is measureable




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: