Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Can anyone seriously argue that ingredient labels are anti-market?

Well, it's fairly close to an issue which has been controversial: whether to require the labelling of GM milk.

Personally, I'm happy for there to be a goodly amount of regulation about consumables. I don't think a raw free market (if you sell food which makes people sick, your brand will suffer) provides enough protection in that case.

I was really trying to think about the benefits+costs of forcing sellers to give more information to consumers, and how that might translate to other products.

(Warning: - this program is written in C - it may suffer from buffer overruns. - this program is written in .NET/java - it may require a huge download in order to run - etc)

Slightly more seriously, how about a govt regulation which required showing typical working set size of your program in operation in Mbytes?

How about being required to notify users that your software patches system-level functionality? (no more DRM "rootkits" )?



If I could create backup copies of myself and/or run copies of myself in a VM I wouldn't really care about labels on food, medicine or even FDA approvals.


You might, if you find out too late that your liver has been compromised and rolling back to a previous snapshot means you're not married anymore.


Actually, I think that would be a killer app for many people...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: