You mean that AI would strive to create a capitalist libertarian utopia, where healthcare is a privilege, guns an absolute right, abortion a crime, and dark money in politics widespread?
And a reactionary, far-right lobby inside the judicial branch is the best example you could come up with?
Let’s not forget that the current SCOTUS has six Federalist Society current or former members, of which at least one, Thomas, has already noted that they should overturn rulings like those concerning access to contraceptives, marriage equality, or anti-sodomy laws.
Regardless, I would be willing to say that the issue with AI being “anti conservative”, if that is a thing at all, is the fact that modern republicanism has been reactionary against every single social advancement since pretty much the 70s, and has not moved forward much ever since.
Who has censored what? And why would it matter in the context of the study, anyway? The issues with the Federalist Society and modern conservatism are very real, very specific, and have nothing to do with Trump, who is just a symptom.
The opposite is the tyranny of the minority, which is even worse for a country as a whole.
I’m not sure what your point is here, though. There are three governmental branches in the US precisely because of this. If anything, the judicial branch is the one that presents a more imminent risk to minorities.
It's great, as long as you are in the majority. But if you're in the 49% (or less) category, then it is tyrannical and untenable. I don't know if you have a family, but if you do, do you put all of your decisions as a parent to a vote?
