Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's more than just framing. It's one set of people telling another set of people what they can and cannot do with the land they own. That seems to be a bit of a tie breaker. The parent you replied to wasn't telling other people what to do with land they owned, he was objecting to people telling him what he could do on land he owned (within reason, like a duplex/triplex, or an accessory dwelling unit).

There's no principal like safety behind how restrictive many of these rules are, unless you count fear of people in different economic demographics to be a reasonable justification. It's a difference of opinion.

People who want more flexible zoning are growing in number, these are people who can't find an affordable place to live or are otherwise not happy with the changes made to zoning in the last 75-100 years, and they are driving changes in more and more localities.



> within reason, like a duplex/triplex, or an accessory dwelling unit.

OP is literally advocating for building refugee camps, not duplexes.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: