Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

She must have known where the bailout money was coming from (FTX customer funds). Yet she accepted it. That makes her appear as complicit.


I should hope so. The timing of their intimate relationship will play a big part in the entire timeline. What a hot mess.


Beyond a reasonable doubt?


Let's assume there's no documentation or non-conspiring witnesses who can pin someone, but there are five co-conspirators. They will quickly turn on each other and spill the beans. Literally the prisoner's dilemma. All the government needs to do is threaten 20 years in prison. People will do anything including betraying friends and lovers to get that down to 5 or 10 or zero.


From public knowledge, no, it's all speculative.

But it's quite possible that after the DOJ finishes twisting enough thumbs, they will have a stronger case against her than you or I do.


I would suggest that a CEO should know where any magic beans are coming from beyond a reasonable doubt. Not knowing where those magic beans are coming from is its own kind of special trouble, from a legal liability perspective.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: