Afaik the claim was not that "it writes correct papers", but that it compiles knowledge. and to that extent it was accurate, along with the disclaimer that it hallucinates things, because it goes on tangents that are often unrelted
The paper was useful for that reason: as a search engine for underresearched and speculative connections within fields, and from what i saw it does well in that. For example, when brainwashing ideas or looking for other research directions to review. In fact, we already have Perspectives papers being published in journals which are speculative in nature.
The paper was useful for that reason: as a search engine for underresearched and speculative connections within fields, and from what i saw it does well in that. For example, when brainwashing ideas or looking for other research directions to review. In fact, we already have Perspectives papers being published in journals which are speculative in nature.
This is a reasonable take on its usefulness: https://twitter.com/mad_enrico/status/1592664384031330309
> It's still not perfect but a very interesting tool to search about new topics,