Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Materials cost is a major factor however.

Here’s a house in materials form - it’s still $120k.

https://www.menards.com/main/building-materials/books-buildi...



I'm just talking about doing the stuff that anybody can figure out to do. You purchase materials, and you hire craftsmen to do the hard stuff. I'm also not talking about getting a house for free, I'm talking about boring house prices that track inflation rather than exciting house prices that track bitcoin.


Well you can always be the general contractor and do just that for a standalone home. Shop around and hire the workers for each part. Most people don't because it takes time, work, and knowledge, so they would rather pay someone.

Alternatively, you can get a new prefabricated home built and delivered for about 100K or less.

I think a lot of cities have zoning regulations against doing that, but it's common in the country and counties.

Where I think you do have a point is the land. That's often the expensive part. It's not as wild as Bitcoin, but it certainly does follow the market.


Interesting. Surely the price includes some amount of markup however?


> You Save $16,061.01 with Mail-In Rebate


So 3-10% of the cost here in the Bay Area?


Who pays 1mil building costs for 1700 sqft?


Huh?


Building costs in SF are high but not that high


I think you’re completely inverting the situation I was describing?

A typical 1700 sq ft in the peninsula is 1.5-3million.

Materials costs for construction are at most 3-10% of that. So a couple hundred grand.


I see, I thought you were saying that number was 3-10% of the building costs in the BA




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: