Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Some articles deemed non-notable are rapidly deleted, some are flagged for improvement, some are moved to draftspace, some are put up for a request for deletion and pass or fail, some are ignored for years or decades.

Wikipedia is a living document and so expect the entries to continue to evolve [0] Besides, editors work on whatever they think is worthwhile; Wikipedia is not compulsory [1]

> Notability is held up as a core concern of Wikipedia mostly by editors who want to delete specific articles, and who measure the value of their contributions through deletion by the barnstars they're awarded for it.

As someone who edits Wikipedia on a fairly regular basis, it is annoying to come up against such editors [2], but this pretty much is working as-designed unless someone's actively trying to game the system, which is not encouraged [3] and you can definitely call them out on it [4].

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:BRICK_BY_BRICK

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:VOLUNTEER

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NOFUN

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:GAME

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:REDRESS



I would hope it's obvious that I've been pointed to these policies many times before, and acting on them didn't help the problem any.

It's exhausting as a volunteer with limited time working on a narrow area to have drive-by administrative editors who don't contribute to the subject, and bots with broken or overzealous criteria, snipe one of a half-dozen similarly sourced articles on the same subject that I've contributed six months after the last edit, with no meaningful means of redress no matter how many times someone links WP:DR to me.

The end result isn't a better Wikipedia, it's one fewer contributor.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: