Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Copyright Corruption Scandal Surrounds Anti-Piracy Campaign (torrentfreak.com)
126 points by CountHackulus on Dec 1, 2011 | hide | past | favorite | 7 comments


Is the lack of comments for this article because this hypocrisy is so commonplace now most people don't even bat an eye when it happens?

I'm not in the Netherlands so I don't know exactly how big of a firestorm it is over there (according to the article it is pretty big) but it seems like if this happened in the US most people would just roll their eyes, sigh and then go on to the next article.

So if the RIAA did something like this (I recall hearing something similar but can't remember any relevant links), what exactly can musicians since they're essentially running everything?


Yeah I think people are numb by now...

Yes, over and over again, copyright law has been demonstrated to be, in practice, a cudgel used by the big guys against the little guys and not the other way around. This is, like, the fifth or six instance of copyright violation by the "copyright protectors" that been in the news over the past few years and hardly the most flagrant - someone even plagiarized a pro-copyright press release at one point.


This is way worse:

- copyright protection agency uses music without permission.

- author of the music discovers this.

- author complains at protection agency.

- nothing happens.

- author tries harder.

- board member of agency suggests he can make things move, on the condition that he will get a 1/3 cut of the money.

- the phone call in which this suggestion is made is taped and broadcast on national T.V.

Also, the agency apparently has stated they cannot rule out that other board members behave similarly. That probably was just a not-so-smart statement made in the spur of the moment, but who knows?

This will be discussed in parliament next week.


Lilly Allen joined anti-piracy campaigns, but then released music on her blog without permission. And then, when people told her, she blustered about how that didn't count.

There are many many examples.


He's suing for little money. At RIAA rates, that would be 250 billion dollars for 10 millions illegal downloads at 25k$ each.


Its even worse. BREIN didn't just download it to enjoy it and as a byproduct made it available to others. They intentionally redistributed it with the intent of actually profiting from it financially. I don't usually call music piracy stealing but when the shoe starts to fit...


That's under US copyright law. This is in the Netherlands, and related to DVDs distributed in the Netherlands.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: