You're right, and the conventional advice has been to have a mix of stocks and bonds, with bonds to reduce volatility and preserve some of the wealth that you might need to access in the shorter term. However, what's unusual about the past few months is that bonds have been getting whacked too!
Here's a comparison of four Vanguard funds, with stock:bond ratios of 80:20, 60:40, 40:60, 20:80 respectively: https://totalrealreturns.com/s/VASGX,VSMGX,VSCGX,VASIX What I find interesting is that they are all experiencing significant and comparable drawdowns right now.
I'm of the old school bogleheads mentality. I've typically been ageInBonds since I started investing after the great recession. While I expect poor stock performance, I am pretty shook by the poor returns on bonds. I accepted years of poor performance with the expectation that they would cushion the blow during the next recession, and they have done nothing.
I don't know how long, or how bad this recession will be, but I will likely be much less willing to hold bonds going forward.
I think part of the problem is established dogma (and regulatory regime) that believes bonds offer diversification from stocks. However this seems to have broken down post 2008, as they have become increasingly correlated.
Imho it's healthy to expect that market regimes change, especially since we do not operate in free market, but a semi-intervined market (where the Fed sets the price of money which is an incredibly important input to the global economy).
I also think it's important to not think of diversification in terms of asset classes anymore, but in terms of alpha source.
I know this is much harder to do because, as far as I know, only by actively trading can you isolate and quantify alpha sources like this.
At an individual bonds maturity I get the full principal back. How do I do that principal back from a bond fund if the value has dropped due to the macro environment?
The value will have dropped, but the distributions/dividends you got in the meantime will have made up the difference. The fund and its underlying holdings must end up even in the end (minus fees).
Bonds have been the only thing backstopping my 401k from taking the bigger hit that equities have taken, the Vanguard 500 portion itself is down 21% or something and total I'm still down 16% or something like that YTD.
I'm guessing it's the "real returns with investment" that is painful here... bonds may not be losing (as) much but they're also not keeping pace with 10-15% annualized inflation either.
Due to the way energy prices (which are a massive component of everything else too) are factored out of CPI, even TIPS probably has negative real returns at this point compared to reality. Is there a non-CPI TIPS equivalent, lol?
Here's a comparison of four Vanguard funds, with stock:bond ratios of 80:20, 60:40, 40:60, 20:80 respectively: https://totalrealreturns.com/s/VASGX,VSMGX,VSCGX,VASIX What I find interesting is that they are all experiencing significant and comparable drawdowns right now.
Here are treasury bonds with a comparison between duration: https://totalrealreturns.com/s/VFISX,VFITX,VUSTX
And here are corporate bonds with a comparison between duration: https://totalrealreturns.com/s/VFSTX,VFICX,VWESX
Even inflation-protected bonds (TIPS) are in trouble: https://totalrealreturns.com/s/VIPSX
So right now, bonds are not doing much to provide the short-term real wealth preservation that lets people take the 100% time exposure risk.