Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If it were possibly to succinctly and wholly explain how a neural network works then the problem wouldn't require a neural network to solve.


Agree in general, though I have read about cases where a neural network was reverse engineered to create a solution that did not require one.


I get what you're saying, but this is not immediately obvious.

For example, control systems also adapt to data and are often robust to noise, and they're understood mathematically very well.

I don't necessarily disagree, but you would need some more justification.


To be a little pedantic, I’d use the word approximate rather than solve.


To be even more pedantic, I'd use the phrase approximate the solution ;-)


Nice




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: